Skip to content


Kicking the tires on Windows 7

The other day I bought a copy of Windows 7 Pro for the PC I’m piecing together.  After I got it, I thought how nice it would be to at least be familiar with the OS when I hit the power switch on the new PC for the 1st time.  Then I got to thinking about how much I dislike Vista on my laptop.  After a quick compatibility check I decided to take it for a spin to see what I thought of it.

I wanted to do a clean install, I don’t care for OS upgrades, most leave too many fragments laying around.  So I moved any important files to my desktop PC,  slipped in the new shiny Win 7 DVD and rebooted.  After selecting the language, keyboard and locale options the installer took me to the 2nd screen to choose the partition I wanted to install the OS to.  I still had the software backup partition with Vista and original software on the drive… This is a new OS, I won’t be need that, delete.  OK now there is unused space, so I’ll just delete the main partition as well and create a new one. Delete, confirm, New, size, Apply.  Then a window pops up saying that Windows may create additional partitions for system files, choices are  OK or Cancel.  I don’t want to cancel but it’s not OK either!  After doing some digging I found if you accept creating the partition at install time it is fairly difficult to remove.  I don’t know if that is true because I also found that to avoid the extra partition from being created the drive must be partitioned before beginning installation.  To do this from the Win 7 DVD, boot from the DVD and at the language, keyboard and locale selection screen hit SHIFT + F10 keys to bring up a command prompt.  From the command prompt you can run diskpart to create a partition on you drive, you will need to partition all the space on your drive or Windows will still create the unwanted partition in the unallocated space.

The rest of the installation went along flawlessly, without so much as a hiccup.

One thing I found after the installation was complete was that at the logon screen numlock was always off.  After logon your previous state was restored.  I love the keypad and my password contains numeric characters so this won’t fly.  I did some browsing and seen that Shawn, a support engineer for Microsoft, claims that the numlock state before logon is a BIOS setting and not a Windows feature.  Unacceptable answer, sorry Shawn.  By default Windows 7 boots with numlock state from the BIOS setting.  However if your BIOS does not have numlock state as an option Windows defaults to numlock off at boot time.  But it can be changed with a couple quick edits to the registry… It must be one of those undocumented features Microsoft loves, right Shawn?  OK, so let’s document this in case someone else might want to do this too.  The keys that need to be modified are:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Keyboard\InitialKeyboardIndicators

HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Control Panel\Keyboard\InitialKeyboardIndicators

You will also need to change the Key for each unique user ID number in the HKEY_USERS hive.

HKEY_USERS\{your unique user id number}\Control Panel\Keyboard\InitialKeyboardIndicators

The best way to find all keys is to open regedit under an adminstrator account and find each occurance of InitialKeyboardIndicators key.

You will need to assign the value of 2 to each of the above keys.  This will set numlock state to on at boot time.   Below is the complete list of options if you would also like to set your caplocks and scrollock state as well.

0 – Turn all indicators Off (NumLock, CapsLock, ScrollLock)
1 – Turn CapsLock On
2 – Turn NumLock On
3 – Turn CapsLock and NumLock On
4 – Turn ScrollLock On
5 – Turn CapsLock and ScrollLock On
6 – Turn NumLock and ScrollLock On
7 – Turn all indicators On (NumLock, CapsLock, ScrollLock)

After fixing that I reinstalled all my other software and changed various settings to my liking.  I did have to set a couple older programs to run in compatibility mode, but everything went well.

My first impression of Windows 7 is a very good one.  User Access Control is much less intrusive than in Vista and can be adjusted depending on how often you would like to be interrupted by it.  I also must say that setting up a home network with XP on my desktop PC was much simpler than it was in Vista.  The quicklaunch bar is gone (although you can get it back) instead you can pin items directly to the taskbar or start menu easily.  The jury is still out on my opinion 7′s use of libraries, I can see where it could be useful, I’m just not used to it yet.

I will keep XP on my old desktop, it’s old enough that I can’t justify putting 7 on it.  But after the test drive I’ve decided to keep 7 on the laptop and I’ll have to get another copy for the new PC, so I’ll be playing with 7 for quite some time.  I’ll jot down some notes here if I find some things about it that can’t be easily found elsewhere on the net.

Share

Posted in Computing & Internet.

Tagged with , .


Building a new PC…Finally

I’ve been playing with computers now for quite a while.  I started with an Atari 1200XL, which may give you some sort of time reference.  Then moved up to a PC, with DOS 6.0 & Windows 3.1.  Updated to one with Win98 and got into Linux, upgraded to Win 2k PRO.  Updated to XP.  Still dual booting Linux, it’s a lot of fun!  Then got a laptop with Vista…The laptop is good, Vista – not so much.

Anyhow, I’ve been wanting to piece together a PC since my days with Win98, I just never got around to it.

Well now’s a good time as any.  So I scoured the hardware reviews & buyers opinions and came up with a system that should last me a while… See above, I don’t update too often!  Here’s what I came up with:

For the case I’m planning to stuff everything into a Corsair Graphite 600T.  I guess I shouldn’t say “stuff everything into”, for a mid tower case it’s fairly large, especially compared to the one I have now.  I was looking for a case that I wouldn’t have problems fitting today’s larger video cards into and still keep good air flow around it.  I’ve looked at this case at MicroCenter, and I’m happy with my decision on it.

Speaking of video cards, I’m putting a 2 Gb XFX – Radeon 6950 in it.  It’s not cutting edge, but I’m not a huge gamer,  so it should easily handle my needs.

I’m going to rely on the i7 2600k to do the number crunching.  Worked out pretty well for me, after the sales were halted on the 1155 motherboards, I got a good price on the CPU.

To cool that puppy down, I’m putting a Corsair Hydro H70 on it.

I don’t have the motherboard yet.  I’m glad I waited to get one since I didn’t know about the B2 stepping issue with the motherboard chipset.  When they become available again I plan to use a MSI P67 GD65.  I was going to use a Gigabyte board, but with the rest of my layout it would leave only 1 open SATA connection.  The MSI option will leave me with three open connections to use so it would give me a little extra room to expand.  I have heard the the MSI BIOS still has a few bugs, maybe they can get this worked out while they are waiting on the new chipsets.

As far as memory goes, gee I forgot…No, I plan to fill it up with G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600, 4 Gb modules (total 16 Gb).  I don’t overclock much so the 1600′s should be plenty fast enough.

Getting to storage, I’m going to install the OS on a Corsair 128 Gb SATAIII Solid State drive.  Personal files and settings will be put on two 1 Tb Seagate Barracudas.  These are 7200 RPM drives on SATAII connectors set up as RAID0.

The optical drive will be a Lite-on iHBS112,  Blu-Ray burner.

I’m not a huge fan of onboard audio or surround sound, so I’m tossing in a M-AUDIO Audiophile 2496 sound card.

All this will be powered by a Cooler Master 1000W power supply.

Edit: After doing a little, OK quite a bit of reading on power supplies, I came across a site explaining typical power supply reviews.  What I read made sense to me, so I did more looking into the power supply I had chosen and quickly decided that I wanted to look at other options.  Instead of the one originally listed, I believe I going to install a Corsair AX 850 in my system.

After an unattended install of Win7 PRO 64 bit and a newer version of Office, and I should be good to go.  It might not be the fastest thing on the planet, but should be OK for web browsing & email…hehe!

I haven’t looked into it much, but installing Windows and Linux on a single RAID array may not work too well.  So I may need to throw another hard drive in it for Linux.  Which is why I was looking to get more SATA connectors on the motherboard.

Look it over, if you see anything that don’t look right let me know.

Share

Posted in Computing & Internet.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .


Do Proposed Warning Labels Go Far Enough?

The newly proposed cigarette warning labels seem to be stirring a bit of controversy,  some find them to be a bit harsh and graphic.  I’m trying to wrap my head around how anyone could possibly be offended being forced to subject their children to graphic images plastered on cigarette advertising while walking to the counter of your local convenience store or gas station.

The proposed rules  would require the images to occupy at least 20% of any advertising space and the 50% of the space on the front and back of cigarette packs.  I see nothing wrong with a healthy overdose of reality for the youngsters in this country.  It’s not like we would have the audacity to force them to watch the absurd violence of watching Elmer Fudd shooting the tail off poor defenseless Bugs Bunny on a Saturday morning.

I am even pondering if the proposed rules go far enough.  Sure they may have cigarettes covered for now, but what about some of the other health issues we face daily.

Take vehicle crashes for example, in 2009 there were 33,808  deaths due to vehicle crashes in the U.S.  We are constantly being reminded that seat belts and airbags greatly reduce the possibility of death during a crash.  It seems to me that a large permanent warning image placed on the passenger’s dash and the center of the steering wheel of all vehicles should be made mandatory.  The image should also be placed prominently on all “click it or ticket” road signs.  That may get people’s attention and remind them to buckle up better than that insistent distracting light on the dash.

OK, maybe a seat belt might not have saved this girl, it doesn’t appear that the airbags helped much either.  Regardless, the message is a good one and if a message like this would save one life wouldn’t it make it worthwhile to make sure everyone sees it?

One of the major causes of car crashes is the use of alcohol, which many times negates the life saving characteristics of seat belts.  If you decide to drink and don’t kill yourself when you crash, you are still taking health risks.  Brain damage & liver disease might get you.  So I propose these images be placed on alcoholic beverage containers, advertising billboards, and television commercials. The first image shows the long term effects of alcohol on the brain.  With that much structural change one’s thought processes is also bound to change.  Thus, scientifically proving true the T-shirts you’ve seen, “Instant Asshole – Just add alcohol”.  On the second thought the instant part may not necessarily true, some people are assholes before they start drinking.  On a further note, once this damage is done it cannot be reversed, so you will then forever be an asshole.  No one likes an asshole, so most would just as soon see you keep drinking you pathetic life away until you liver resembles the second image.  To avoid this scenario from becoming an actuality to today’s youth in America these images should be seen by all children early and often.

Another big fat health concern in the forefront is well, big and fat, and the dangers it can pose.  Dealing primarily with the fast food industry can keep today’s youth from succumbing to coronary heart disease later in life by simply displaying images of the effects the happy meal they are about to devour may have on them. 

Displaying images similar to this on the menu board, food wrappers, sacks, boxes, billboards, and television advertisements should raise awareness significantly.  Current proposals are to ban including toys with kids meals. But think about it, the kids like the toys in a kids meal, but they like the food too.  The toys will break on the way home, you will throw it away, and it will not be missed.  How is this going to reduce the sales of the toxins we happily keep poisoning our children with.  It won’t.  But with gruesome images constantly being drilled into our children’s consciousness they will eventually not even want these products.

We can eventually expand this into other health issues as well:

I am not going to go into great detail below, just trying to get my point across, as far as dietary issues we have.

  • Red Meat – Increased risk of cancer
  • Fish – Risk of increased mercury levels
  • Pork – Risk of parasites
  • Eggs – Risk of Salmonella
  • Dairy – Risk of cancer & cardiovascular disease
  • Vegan diet – Risk various vitamin and mineral deficiencies

That pretty much leaves water.  Water is needed to survive but does not provide any nutrients that the body also needs.  Some water sources contain arsenic and other contaminants that can be unhealthy as well.

To avoid the risks of these issues warning stickers should be put on all foodstuffs,  and advertising materials of each.

After reading all the warning stickers on all food stuffs. No one will want eat or drink anything for fear of the health risks associated involved.  So I came up with another warning label, but I can’t figure out anything to stick it on.

Furthermore, I have not been able to come up with any activity, or inactivity for that matter, that does not have at least one health risk associated with it.

Knowing this, maybe our government needs to stop and realize that life itself is a terminal disease with a 100% mortality rate.  It is not the government’s responsibility, obligation, or right to protect its people from their own decisions.

It is also high time the people of this country take responsibility for their own actions, quit trying to blame others for the consequences of decisions they have made themselves, and wake up to the fact Hank Williams and Fred Rose penned so eloquently, “I’ll Never Get Out of This World Alive”.

Share

Posted in Government & Politics.

Tagged with , .


Squashing Plans for Mosque using Eminent Domain

New York republican gubernatorial nominee Carl Paladino’s campaign promise to stop the building of a mosque planned near ground zero may be a fun fight to watch.

I am no fan of eminent domain myself. I have no personal experience of the government paying me pennies on the dollar for my home for the greater good of the community. However, even without any personal experience, I believe that a person owning land should not be forced from it because of community plans or the economic welfare of a local or state government whose track record is no better (or quite possibly worse) than mine.  In my mind I was here first, pay me an agreed upon price or take your plans elsewhere.

At the same time I don’t believe that a mosque being built near ground zero is such a good idea either. There may be nothing illegal about it, but in principle it would be worse than building a strip club next to you local elementary school (although some of the youngsters might enjoy going to school a bit more…Hmmm, I might be on to something there).  Many on the left decry the rights of a religious group to build a place of worship, which I also have no qualms with.  But the peaceful religions I know of would not attempt to build on a site knowing the amount of resentment and provocation their plans are promoting.

What a dilemma, which is the lesser of two evils?

Enter Carl Paladino, he claims to be against eminent domain. However, he must dislike the idea of a mosque being built near ground zero more so. He promises that if elected he would “use the power of eminent domain to stop this mosque and make the site a war memorial instead of a monument to those who attacked our country”.

If he is elected (don’t hold your breath, we’re talking about New York here), and if he keeps his campaign promise (again, keep breathing – this is a politician), and if he would play his cards right, one of two things could potentially happen.  On the outside chance that all of the above comes to pass there would be a very long, drawn out, and very expensive court battle.  In the end the mosque would be built but eminent domain would be dealt a devastating blow, or eminent domain would win out and there would be no mosque.  Either would be palatable in my opinion, but both would put whipped cream and a cherry on top.  Right off the top of my head I can only think of one way for that to happen.  Go to court, fight it out, and keeping fighting him until you bleed off all his financial resources and win. The ACLU would then need to step in and fund an appeal, which would overturn the lower court’s decision. That would be the devastating blow for eminent domain, and the investor for the mosque would have no monies left to carry on with his plan and would be forced to sell to Donald Trump, who offered $6 billion to buy the building from him…  Hey, it’s my fairy tale, I’ll tell it how I want to… And they all lived happily aver after.

To add a little more realism, I doubt Paladino’s plan is little more than a ploy to win out at the primaries and use this as a divide and conquer technique against the democrats that support both building the mosque and robbing people of their property at a reduced rate that is not negotiable by the current owner.

Good luck Carl, you’ll need it.

Share

Posted in Government & Politics.

Tagged with , , .